|
Our new report, Profiting from People: Inside the UK’s Asylum Hotels, reveals how the government’s long-term use of hotels to house people seeking asylum has become a vehicle for profit rather than protection. Drawing on over two years of RAMFEL’s casework and testimonies from people trapped in hotel accommodation, we show how successive governments have handed billions of pounds of public money to private contractors while people are forced to live in unsafe, degrading conditions.
The full report is available here. In this period, we supported almost 500 people placed in hotels, including families crammed into single rooms for months on end, children going hungry, and people with serious health conditions denied care. One mother described being unable to open the windows in her mould-infested room. Another family’s baby was documented by a GP as experiencing malnutrition caused by hotel food. The report draws on extensive research and interviews with hotel residents, revealing:
Our report exposes how decades of outsourcing, poor oversight, and deliberate hostility have turned asylum housing into a profit-driven industry. The government continues to ignore repeated warnings about the human cost of this system. We are calling on the government to:
RAMFEL’s Head of Campaigning, Nick Beales, stated: “The use of hotels as asylum accommodation has to end without delay. Contrary to what politicians across the divide claim, these hotels are not luxurious – they are vermin infested, prison-like, wholly inadequate for long-term use and are now routinely attacked and targeted by far-right racists. The people housed in them for months and years on end are desperate to leave and start rebuilding their lives in the UK. However, with no right to work until their claims are approved, they cannot support themselves and must rely on government accommodation. If the government is serious about reforming the asylum system, they should immediately permit asylum seekers the right to work, allowing them to support themselves and their families. This would save the taxpayer money and strengthen social cohesion by ensuring greater day-to-day interaction between people seeking asylum and local residents.” ENDS Comments are closed.
|
Details
Archives
November 2025
Categories |
RSS Feed